Emi­ly Schnei­der spoke with acclaimed author Dara Horn about her new graph­ic nov­el, One Lit­tle Goat: A Passover Cat­a­stro­phe. Illus­trat­ed by Theo Ellsworth, this fan­tas­tic tale begins when a child mis­places the afiko­man, set­ting in motion a voy­age through Jew­ish his­to­ry and one family’s past.

Emi­ly Schnei­der: Dara, I’m going to start by ask­ing you what may be an obvi­ous ques­tion. You have a very suc­cess­ful and acclaimed career as a nov­el­ist and a pub­lic intel­lec­tu­al writ­ing about a range of sub­jects. What moti­vat­ed you to write One Lit­tle Goat, a graph­ic nov­el of inter­est and con­cern to both chil­dren and adults?

Dara Horn: I actu­al­ly first thought of this idea a num­ber of years ago. I was on a road trip with my fam­i­ly in Cal­i­for­nia, with my four chil­dren, and we stopped at a com­ic book shop. My kids are all into this kind of thing. And one book that they came home with was a very, very thick graph­ic nov­el by this car­toon­ist, Theo Ellsworth. They were fight­ing over this book through­out the whole trip! I bor­rowed this book from them, and I was just enchant­ed by the art­work. And at that point, an idea I’d had for a graph­ic nov­el sort of came roar­ing back to me. I could see how it could come to life, now that I saw an artist whose work I real­ly appre­ci­at­ed. And I looked this artist up; I knew noth­ing about him. He’s a pret­ty acclaimed indie comics artist. Theo Ellsworth, lives in Mon­tana. He’s prob­a­bly not Jew­ish. This is a kind of deep in the weeds idea for some­one who does­n’t know much about Passover. I cold-emailed him, said, Hi, I love your work. I’m a writer. Here’s an idea. It’s a lit­tle hard to explain.” And he was total­ly game. But the deep­er ques­tion that you’re ask­ing is, why would I do this when I’m real­ly writ­ing for adults my whole career? This is an idea I’ve been think­ing about since I was a child. I’ve always been fas­ci­nat­ed by the seder and how it is much more sim­i­lar to oth­er seders than it is to oth­er days of the year. When you’re at the seder table, it’s much more sim­i­lar to being at a seder table ten years ago than it is to some­thing that hap­pened the week before. And it feels much more con­nect­ed through time than space. This is some­thing I’ve been fas­ci­nat­ed by since I was a kid — the idea of Jew­ish life and texts being a por­tal to a past that we real­ly should­n’t have access to is some­thing that I’ve writ­ten about in all of my books. All of my books are some ver­sion of this. This is sim­ply the most direct version.

ES: You begin your jour­ney into Pesach, the fes­ti­val of free­dom, by recon­sid­er­ing a myth. This is a hol­i­day Jews through­out the world are cel­e­brat­ing. It’s so imbued with mean­ing for every­one, across a broad range of reli­gious obser­vance. So it must be an unal­loyed joy for chil­dren, right? 

DH: Yes, and also because it’s a hol­i­day that’s osten­si­bly sup­posed to be cen­ter­ing children.

ES: That is real­ly at the cen­ter of your book. For many kids, it could be tedious, repet­i­tive, a lit­tle bit opaque, even though, as you said, chil­dren have a star­ring role. 

DH: Yes, this hol­i­day’s cel­e­brat­ing free­dom, but you are stuck at that table for a very long time. This is a dynam­ic that I’m very famil­iar with because my whole fam­i­ly’s life has been built to pro­tect chil­dren from it. I’m the host of my fam­i­ly seder. 

I’m one of four chil­dren, and, in the seder that I grew up in, my par­ents avoid­ed this bore­dom by hav­ing us be very involved in a cre­ative way. We would have to write songs and skits, act­ing out the dif­fer­ent parts of the sto­ry. It was dif­fer­ent every sin­gle year. We would work on this whole show that we would put on at dif­fer­ent points in the seder. The sto­ry of Abra­ham smash­ing the idols would be Mesopotami­an Idol, a par­o­dy of Amer­i­can Idol. It was always some­thing based on what­ev­er was trend­ing in pop cul­ture at that time. 

Now, I also have four chil­dren. My par­ents have a total of four­teen grand­chil­dren. So it’s a large seder I host, with a lot of young peo­ple. I had to make a deci­sion. Either I can read every sin­gle page of the Hag­gadah, or I can have my chil­dren enjoy Pesach. That involves a ridicu­lous amount of cre­ativ­i­ty, and that’s what we’ve done. Our seder is very tra­di­tion­al in that we do read every page of the Hag­gadah. It’s very untra­di­tion­al in that we use tech­nol­o­gy. We have all these dif­fer­ent set­tings that you move through and you meet dif­fer­ent char­ac­ters in the Pesach sto­ry. In one room, the angel of death pops out of a clos­et and slays the Pharao­h’s son. In anoth­er room, we have a blue lasers and fog machine that fills the space with a blue fog, but only up to waist height. It cre­ates this wave-like look on the sur­face. And as you walk through it, it parts in front of you. Every­body in our seder is per­son­al­ly expe­ri­enc­ing com­ing out of Egypt. Some of these ideas I got from clas­si­cal Jew­ish sources. Every­body’s very invest­ed and the oth­er most impor­tant part is the kids have roles in our Seder. And it’s become a com­pe­ti­tion every year of who can make it new­er, more inter­est­ing, fun­nier. My daugh­ter’s the wan­der­ing Aramean; she comes and she has a scroll that she wraps around the entire room that has the pas­sage we all read out loud togeth­er. We have light-up Had Gadya ani­mals that my hus­band made by sol­der­ing a bunch of LED lights togeth­er. So it’s like a Vegas seder! 

Every year we make a movie out of these pieces and recre­ate the Pesach sto­ry. We divide up the sto­ry into the dif­fer­ent fam­i­ly pods. This group of sib­lings is assigned to do the burn­ing bush or some oth­er piece of the tale. And then the final prod­uct is screened. No one knows what the oth­er peo­ple have done, but every­body feels very invest­ed in their part.

ES: The search for the afiko­man, for a lot of fam­i­lies, is a brief scav­enger hunt that ends the meal. How did you decide to make that the cen­tral motif of the sto­ry, a pos­si­bly end­less jour­ney into the past? 

DH: This actu­al­ly was sort of inspired by anoth­er seder that I went to grow­ing up. For the sec­ond night, we would go to fam­i­ly friends that host­ed this gigan­tic seder, with forty or fifty peo­ple. It was mul­ti-gen­er­a­tional, with every­one seat­ed by age at this very long table. The old peo­ple were at one end and the kids were at the oth­er end.

The peo­ple at the end of the table had sur­vived the War­saw Ghet­to. They were singing a par­ti­san song. Now I have a PhD. in Yid­dish, but, at the time, I kept ask­ing them to trans­late, and they would­n’t. There was a mid­dle sec­tion of the seder with peo­ple who were Sovi­et Refuseniks who had come over to the US 1979. They were using the seder as a part of their move­ment for Sovi­et Jew­ry. And then there were the kids on the end who were sort of just sit­ting around jok­ing about The Simp­sons. It was as though three very dis­tinct seders were hap­pen­ing. The one part I real­ly enjoyed and looked for­ward to at the seder in my house, was find­ing the afiko­man which my dad had hid­den. At this large seder, it was the oppo­site — the kids would hide it. This fam­i­ly’s house was much less orga­nized than mine and there was a feel­ing of total chaos and there was always a point where some­one did­n’t remem­ber where they had put the afikoman.

ES: You extend­ed that expe­ri­ence. What if the afiko­man actu­al­ly dis­ap­peared and end­ed in time travel?

DH: Exact­ly. The rea­son that you give a prize to some­body to get the afiko­man back is because you actu­al­ly can’t end the cer­e­mo­ny with­out it.

ES: You point­ed out that chil­dren are cen­tral to this cel­e­bra­tion. At the seder, the four ques­tions are per­for­ma­tive and are an oppor­tu­ni­ty to give the par­ents an oppor­tu­ni­ty to kvell. The four sons, or chil­dren, are dif­fer­ent. To me, that embod­ies one of the worst mis­takes we could make as par­ents, which is to assign a per­son­al­i­ty to each child and com­part­men­tal­ize them. Instead of sim­ply refut­ing that, you have the old­est child come to an under­stand­ing of him­self and why that is such a mis­lead­ing way to look at fam­i­lies. How did you devel­op that idea? 

DH: Yes, that’s the take away for the child who’s read­ing it, because chil­dren are look­ing for that sense of self. They’re in this iden­ti­ty for­ma­tion part of their lives. As an adult, you look at the four chil­dren, and think, there’s a lit­tle bit of each of them in each of us. There’s moments in my day where I go through all four of these per­son­al­i­ties. But as a child when you read about these four sons, you are not think­ing that. Even when an adult tells you that, you’re think­ing, Yeah, but not real­ly. My broth­er is the wicked son.” You have this sense of self-right­eous­ness. I grew up in a fam­i­ly with four chil­dren, and now I have four chil­dren. Every time we got to this page, it always felt very per­son­al. What I think about as a par­ent is, when you look at what you think of as your child’s worst qual­i­ty, you are also look­ing at your child’s best quality.

ES: That’s true.

DH: Let’s say that your child gets real­ly angry a lot. Is that the worst qual­i­ty? Who else gets angry a lot? Moses. That guy has a major anger man­age­ment prob­lem. He sees the Egypt­ian taskmas­ter beat­ing a Hebrew slave. He does­n’t write a let­ter to the edi­tor about it. He kills the guy. He keeps get­ting angry through­out the Torah. He’s yelling at Pharaoh for the whole book of Exo­dus. He’s yelling at the Am Yis­rael for the whole book of Deuteron­o­my. He’s sup­posed to talk to the rock. He hits the rock. He comes down from the moun­tain with the tablets. He sees the peo­ple wor­ship­ing idols, he smash­es the tablets. He keeps lash­ing out. He would­n’t be who he is, and he would­n’t have the lead­er­ship that he had, if he did­n’t do that. Because anger is an emo­tion that’s tied to our per­cep­tion of injus­tice. Moses has an exquis­ite aware­ness of jus­tice, and that’s the source of his lead­er­ship. We want chil­dren to get rid of a trait, min­i­mize or out­grow it, but what I’m sug­gest­ing in the book is some­thing a lit­tle dif­fer­ent. Per­haps there is some­thing about that trait that you want to dig into deep­er. Like the wicked” child. Isn’t he actu­al­ly some­one who sees when some­thing isn’t work­ing, in a way that you nev­er would because you like to fol­low the rules? Or the sim­ple” one may be a per­son who’s so much kinder than you would ever be. 

That’s what the sim­ple child” in the book is think­ing about, not the sub­stance of an idea, but how does this affect some­one else’s feel­ings? The child who does­n’t know how to ask turns out to be the key to the whole sto­ry. Chil­dren are real­ly also real­ly wor­ried about that, about liv­ing up to their rep­u­ta­tion in the family. 

ES: They are. Anoth­er part that they will also iden­ti­fy with in the sto­ry is the per­spec­tive that chil­dren have of the adults around them. They love and respect their par­ents and grand­par­ents, but they also find them intense­ly frus­trat­ing. The grand­fa­ther who’s a beloved, yet irri­tat­ing, old per­son. The great-grand­moth­er is super-old, and also irri­tat­ing, but she’s a sur­vivor of the War­saw Ghetto.

DH: The only thing she ever says is, You’re doing it wrong.”

ES: That’s right. The old­est child starts to think about his own fam­i­ly dynam­ics. Why is Dad so seri­ous about Jew­ish hol­i­days? Why does mom want to have so many chil­dren? Young read­ers are going to iden­ti­fy with his feel­ings of ambivalence. 

Art by Theo Ellsworth

DH: When he sees them in oth­er con­texts, as younger peo­ple, it sud­den­ly all clicks into place. It’s dri­ving him nuts that his dad’s so obsessed with hol­i­days. Then he sees his father on Pesach in Min­sk in 1982, when his mom smug­gles a piece of matzah from a secret bak­ery. He sees his moth­er’s seder, and there’s no oth­er kids at this seder table, and now she’s preg­nant with her fifth kid. Wow, that must’ve been real­ly lone­ly for you.” 

ES: Anoth­er part of the book has become coun­ter­cul­tur­al in some ways today. Your jour­ney through Jew­ish his­to­ry seems like an implic­it rebuke to the idea that’s become more preva­lent, ques­tion­ing the idea of Jew­ish peo­ple­hood. Your use of the Hebrew term tel to describe the accu­mu­la­tion of arche­o­log­i­cal ruins of the seders, empha­sizes that you’ve always thought of this hol­i­day as time­less. How did you decide whom to include and where to go? (The time trav­el includes third cen­tu­ry Baby­lo­nia, the War­saw Ghet­to, the eras of Gra­cia Nasi and Sig­mund Freud.) How did you decide to assem­ble this pic­ture of the Jew­ish people? 

DH: This is a sto­ry about Am Yis­rael, and what it means to be a part of Am Yis­rael. There is also some diver­si­ty to what I’m rep­re­sent­ing. Freud’s seder is not a super obser­vant one, it’s more like a Vien­nese din­ner par­ty than a tra­di­tion­al seder. There’s also some cel­e­bra­tions seen as names on the doors — Aden, in Yemen in 1949, Kib­butz Naha­lal in 1958

The seder is a reen­act­ment of the Exo­dus from Egypt, but it’s also a reen­act­ment of all the oth­er seders that came before. That’s true in our own fam­i­ly’s lives. Each year, you’re reen­act­ing pre­vi­ous seders, you’re reen­act­ing what a pre­vi­ous gen­er­a­tion did. But also with­in the seder struc­ture itself, you’re reliv­ing oth­er seders. The Hag­gadah stops, to tell you this sto­ry about these rab­bis in Bnei Brak, about how their bor­ing” seder went on all night. Except that if you learn this his­to­ry, you know that these were rab­bis who end­ed up being exe­cut­ed by the Romans because they were involved in a revolt. 

I want­ed to cap­ture some of the diver­si­ty of seder expe­ri­ences, but also the ways in which this sto­ry res­onates at dif­fer­ent points in Jew­ish his­to­ry, points where it becomes lit­er­al. It’s the idea of Vehi Sheam­da, that in every gen­er­a­tion peo­ple have risen up against the Jew­ish peo­ple and God has saved us from their hands. This is not a book that shies away from this much dark­er aspect of Jew­ish his­to­ry. I con­nect those pieces, which I don’t think are often con­nect­ed so explic­it­ly. The goat says , They’re plot­ting a revolt against Rome.” And that’s sim­i­lar to the War­saw Ghet­to seder. 

Doña Gra­cia Nasi is includ­ed because this wom­an’s a super­hero. She res­cued tens of thou­sands of Jews from the Span­ish Inqui­si­tion, bring­ing them to safe­ty in the Ottoman Empire. And that con­nects, obvi­ous­ly, to Sephar­di experience.

But, ulti­mate­ly, I don’t think it’s about being Sephar­di or Ashke­nazi. Each of these sto­ries is in many ways the same sto­ry, and are all part of the Am Yis­rael sto­ry. I want­ed to include Rav and Shmuel, two sages of the Gemara, because they gave us these two ideas of what the seder means. There is a debate between Rav and Shmuel about the pur­pose of the sto­ry, and the way you tell the sto­ry itself. The Hag­gadah that we have today includes both ver­sions of this sto­ry. Shmuel’s ver­sion is that this is a polit­i­cal sto­ry about free­dom from tyran­ny. You begin in Egypt and you end at the Red Sea. Rav’s idea is that the whole point of Pesach is the mes­sage of spir­i­tu­al lib­er­a­tion. Shmuel’s idea is that we used to serve Pharaoh, and now we serve God. Rav’s idea is, we used to serve idols and now we serve God. That debate is not even a debate because, of course, we’ve set­tled it. It’s both of these things. I want­ed to bring a child into that conversation. 

ES: There’s anoth­er coun­ter­cul­tur­al ele­ment, against the trend towards uni­ver­sal­iz­ing the seder, as a fes­ti­val of free­dom. With­out deny­ing the impor­tance of that aspect of Passover, you focus on the par­tic­u­lars of the Jew­ish experience.

DH: I heard an inter­view recent­ly about the surge in anti­semitism. This per­son said, We grew up with these tra­di­tions, like Pesach, where you’re learn­ing about in every gen­er­a­tion peo­ple rise up to destroy us. I thought that that was just edu­cat­ing me. I did­n’t real­ize it was prepar­ing me.”

Unfor­tu­nate­ly, Jew­ish chil­dren today do need that prepa­ra­tion. But it’s not only prepar­ing for doom, it’s also ready­ing you to draw mean­ing from this tra­di­tion into your own life. It’s part of the prepa­ra­tion of under­stand­ing what it means to live with a his­tor­i­cal con­scious­ness. One Lit­tle Goat is not a uni­ver­sal sto­ry of lib­er­a­tion. Pesach is that, but in this book, I’m giv­ing Jew­ish chil­dren a por­tal to trav­el through, so that they have access to this sto­ry, and to these resources, because they will need them. When I say they will need this sto­ry, I don’t just mean because of ris­ing anti­semitism. They will need it for who­ev­er they become and what­ev­er cir­cum­stances they find them­selves in. I’ve need­ed it.

I’m hop­ing to high­light how Jew­ish peo­ple­hood is basi­cal­ly just a real­ly big family.

Art by Theo Ellsworth

ES: You men­tioned that Theo Ellsworth’s work was your entry point into the book. His work has under­ground comics ele­ments and I think that one of the rea­sons why the pic­tures are so evoca­tive is because they are irreverent.

DH: As you say, there is some­thing grungy and sub­ver­sive about his work. He’s very edgy and it makes you feel like you’re look­ing at some­thing you should­n’t be look­ing at.

ES: The wrin­kles on the great-grand­moth­er are terrifying.

DH: Com­plete­ly ter­ri­fy­ing. And also hilar­i­ous. But what ini­tial­ly drew me to his work was how incred­i­bly intri­cate it was. The lev­el of detail in it acti­vat­ed in me a mem­o­ry of illus­trat­ed books that I loved as a child.

Ellsworth is able to visu­al­ize and make con­crete abstract con­cepts in an amaz­ing way.I had this idea of an under­ground world. There would be lots of doors, and the doors would be labeled. You would open the door and come into the seder. He turned that into an Alice in Won­der­land idea, where some­times your head is the size of the door, and you come in and there’s small peo­ple inside. Some­times you open that door and you’re tiny. And some­times that door is a nor­mal door, or a hatch in the ceil­ing. I nev­er would have thought of any of this. That came entire­ly from him. The whole imagery of the clouds, of how you fast-for­ward 100 years in the tun­nel, was from him. Even the idea of knock­ing on the door and illus­trat­ing the knock, of hav­ing a draw­ing of the sound of knock­ing on a door, these are not things I would have thought of. 

Or the way that he drew the por­tal. I wrote in the script, She throws the afiko­man through a hole in the uni­verse.” I was very vague about it. But he used that as a recur­ring idea, a way to com­mu­ni­cate back and forth between these worlds. Ellsworth’s pic­tures have a sub­ver­sive ele­ment; there is hor­ror. When you go back to the orig­i­nal seder scene in Egypt, I remem­ber him telling me, It’s all going to be cross­hatched and shad­ed. Every­thing’s going to have a total­ly dif­fer­ent dark­er tone.” If you look at the way he draws the peo­ple and the room in that final scene in Egypt, he cre­ates fear in every per­son­’s face. Even the way he drew the goat. He uses dry humor, but there’s an integri­ty and dig­ni­ty to the goat that I just feel anoth­er more typ­i­cal chil­dren’s illus­tra­tor might have made it more, Here’s a hap­py, fun ani­mal. Here’s your ani­mal side­kick.” And it’s not that. Instead, there’s a qui­et fatalism.

ES: Dara, I feel as if you’ve touched upon my last ques­tion, but I still have to ask you: As an Amer­i­can Jew­ish author and a par­ent, how is this seder night going to be dif­fer­ent from all oth­er seder nights? 

DH: This is our sec­ond seder after Octo­ber 7th. In the first seder after Octo­ber 7th, I was in a state of total despair. I’ve been speak­ing out basi­cal­ly non-stop, and I’ve been pulled into a lot of front row seats in a lot of sit­u­a­tions. For exam­ple, I was on an anti­semitism advi­so­ry group to the pres­i­dent of Har­vard Uni­ver­si­ty. I was a wit­ness in Con­gress’s inves­ti­ga­tion of Har­vard about this. And I was in a state of despair about this at the seder last year. 

This year, I’ve made a deci­sion. I very recent­ly found­ed my own non-prof­it. (Hope­ful­ly by Pesach we’ll have a web­site.) It’s called Mosa­ic Per­sua­sion, and the mis­sion of this orga­ni­za­tion is to edu­cate the broad­er Amer­i­can pub­lic about who Jews are, start­ing in school set­tings and work­ing through var­i­ous oth­er chan­nels. So far, we’ve done work­shops for school prin­ci­pals and admin­is­tra­tors. The pro­grams are not just, Com­bat­ing anti­semitism. Here’s ten rea­sons why Israel’s not an apartheid racist state.” It’s a total­ly dif­fer­ent approach that comes from my expe­ri­ences in speak­ing with audi­ences around the coun­try. Speak­ing often with non-Jew­ish audi­ences, I found that in my con­ver­sa­tions with peo­ple around the coun­try, there’s just so much more igno­rance than mal­ice. There’s a lot of room to turn this around, and the fact that there’s a lot more igno­rance than mal­ice means there’s a lot of oppor­tu­ni­ty to acti­vate peo­ple’s curios­i­ty. This year’s seder ver­sus last year’s, I am feel­ing a sense of empow­er­ment. I have hope going for­ward. Rab­bi Aki­va says it in One Lit­tle Goat iden­ti­fy­ing the mean­ing of the Pesach sto­ry, The whole point of this is hope.” This is the inno­va­tion of the Pesach sto­ry, it is a way of impart­ing hope to future generations. 

Emi­ly Schnei­der writes about lit­er­a­ture, fem­i­nism, and cul­ture for TabletThe For­wardThe Horn Book, and oth­er pub­li­ca­tions, and writes about chil­dren’s books on her blog. She has a Ph.D. in Romance Lan­guages and Literatures.